![]() |
Source: Mississippi Oil & Gas Board |
Monday, January 30, 2012
Another Horse On The Hill
Encana has petitioned the Mississippi Oil & Gas Board for a 963 acre unit adjacent to the current Horseshoe Hill location.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Devon Soterra: Frac Job In Progress
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Encana Weyerhaeuser IP Confirmed
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Encana Announces Weyerhaeuser 73H-1 IP
Encana has just released an initial potential for the Weyerhaeuser 73H-1 in St. Helena Parish.
COMPLETED 11/22/2011 AS A OIL WELL IN THE TUSCALOOSA MARINE SHALE RES;PM F 280 BOPD; 98 MCFD; 3090 CP; 14/64 CK; 1277 BWPD; 5% BS&W; 350 GOR; 40 GRVTY PERFS 12862-18019' (ST: 10)
Those "on the ground" claim that it's been consistently flowing 650-800 barrels of oil per day.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Scout Report - January 23, 2012
This week's Scout Report:
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
Encana Permits 3 TMS Wells
Devon Pursues TMS Unit in St. Helena Parish
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Scout Report - January 18, 2012
This week's Scout Report:
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
Encana Pursues Three More TMS Units
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Encana Raises The Drilling Bar
Encana has just finished drilling the Anderson 17H-1 in Amite County, Mississippi. The well, originally permitted for 19,117' with a TVD of 12,220', reached a total measured depth of 19,547'. Drilling of the well only took 39 days which represents a significant increase in drill time and cost reduction. The lateral length calculates to be 7327' which is a TMS record. Encana continues to be the aggressive leader in the TMS play. An offset, the Anderson 18H-1, is currently setting surface casing.
![]() |
Tuscaloosa Marine Shale: Drilling Rates |
Friday, January 13, 2012
The Name Game
I received numerous calls and emails this week after two articles were published about the TMS in industry magazines. The questions regard the naming of the "shale of interest" across central Louisiana. Some parties use the name "Louisiana Eagle Ford" versus the "Tuscaloosa Marine Shale" (aka TMS). The desire to associate with the Eagle Ford Shale of south Texas is obvious from a marketers stand point. As they say, "perception is reality". No one can be faulted for that.
I personally don't care for the name "Tuscaloosa Marine Shale", but the naming convention was created before I was born. There are many marine shales in the Tuscaloosa interval, so that name is not very unique or descriptive. Lithostratigraphic nomenclature usually loses its value once you "leave the neighborhood". Technically, based on over twenty years of sequence stratigraphic work across the trend, I identify this interval as the "upper portion of the Tuscaloosa A Transgressive Systems Tract". The acronym UPTATST might be hard to sell.
Type Log:
http://www.ameliaresources.com/documents/tuscaloosatrend/Amelia%20Resources%20LLC%20WEBSITE%20TUSCALOOSA%20MARINE%20SHALE%20Type%20Log%20June%202011.pdf
The shale being pursued across Vernon, Rapides, and Sabine Parishes is the UPTATST as it is to the east in the Florida Parishes and Mississippi. They are age equivalent, but are part of different hydrocarbon systems and don't share the same rock properties. In a broad sense, I don't believe that they share the same hydrocarbon saturations. The drilling results will deliver the "proof in the pudding" over the coming years. High initial production rates with stable declines will be the ticket to profitability.
At the end of the day, the name of the interval is irrelevant. The age equivalency is also irrelevant. The only relevant criteria are the properties of the rock and the hydrocarbon saturation within it. Those will determine the economics of the play.
I believe that the silica-richness of the TMS-East along with the increased calcareous content in the southern portion of the TMS-East will be key properties driving the success in this region of the play. The clay richness historically experienced in certain areas of the play might have been incorrectly and broadly extrapolated over a very large region.
"Shale-gas and shale-oil plays are not necessarily strictly 'shale' plays as hybrid system - those systems with mixed lithofacies present - appear to be the most productive. Strictly speaking shale is defined by particle size, but in shale-gas plays it is more important to know mineralogy as well as having clay speciation."
Dan Jarvie, Worldwide Geochemistry LLC
I'm working on a comparison of the TMS to the Eaglebine (Madison, Grimes, and Brazos Cty, TX) and the Eagle Ford of Burleson County, Texas. This might be the best analog for the TMS if one is required. The Eagle Ford of south Texas stands alone. Using the rock properties and lithology of the south TX Eagle Ford as an analog for any areas of the TMS is inaccurate and misguided.
I hope that the play works from Texas to Mississippi. It would be a great boom for my home state. Seeing oil booms occur in areas with poor economies is always a great thing. For reasons of simplicity and consistency, this blog will continue to refer to the shale across the entire state as the TMS.
I personally don't care for the name "Tuscaloosa Marine Shale", but the naming convention was created before I was born. There are many marine shales in the Tuscaloosa interval, so that name is not very unique or descriptive. Lithostratigraphic nomenclature usually loses its value once you "leave the neighborhood". Technically, based on over twenty years of sequence stratigraphic work across the trend, I identify this interval as the "upper portion of the Tuscaloosa A Transgressive Systems Tract". The acronym UPTATST might be hard to sell.
Type Log:
http://www.ameliaresources.com/documents/tuscaloosatrend/Amelia%20Resources%20LLC%20WEBSITE%20TUSCALOOSA%20MARINE%20SHALE%20Type%20Log%20June%202011.pdf
The shale being pursued across Vernon, Rapides, and Sabine Parishes is the UPTATST as it is to the east in the Florida Parishes and Mississippi. They are age equivalent, but are part of different hydrocarbon systems and don't share the same rock properties. In a broad sense, I don't believe that they share the same hydrocarbon saturations. The drilling results will deliver the "proof in the pudding" over the coming years. High initial production rates with stable declines will be the ticket to profitability.
At the end of the day, the name of the interval is irrelevant. The age equivalency is also irrelevant. The only relevant criteria are the properties of the rock and the hydrocarbon saturation within it. Those will determine the economics of the play.
![]() |
TMS Core |
"Shale-gas and shale-oil plays are not necessarily strictly 'shale' plays as hybrid system - those systems with mixed lithofacies present - appear to be the most productive. Strictly speaking shale is defined by particle size, but in shale-gas plays it is more important to know mineralogy as well as having clay speciation."
Dan Jarvie, Worldwide Geochemistry LLC
I'm working on a comparison of the TMS to the Eaglebine (Madison, Grimes, and Brazos Cty, TX) and the Eagle Ford of Burleson County, Texas. This might be the best analog for the TMS if one is required. The Eagle Ford of south Texas stands alone. Using the rock properties and lithology of the south TX Eagle Ford as an analog for any areas of the TMS is inaccurate and misguided.
I hope that the play works from Texas to Mississippi. It would be a great boom for my home state. Seeing oil booms occur in areas with poor economies is always a great thing. For reasons of simplicity and consistency, this blog will continue to refer to the shale across the entire state as the TMS.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Email Alerts
A new option has been added to the blog that provides email alerts when new content is added to the site. Type your email in the FOLLOW BY EMAIL box to the right to subscribe.
Scout Report - January 11, 2012
This weeks Scout Report:
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
View Tuscaloosa Trend in a larger map
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
View Tuscaloosa Trend in a larger map
Devon Presentation - Pritchard Capital Partners
Devon has just posted a PDF and webcast of their presentation at the Pritchard Capital Partners LLC Energize Conference. Slide 12 indicates that they plan to participate in 10 wells.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=67097&p=irol-EventDetails&EventId=4693520
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=67097&p=irol-EventDetails&EventId=4693520
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Devon's Rig Moves To The Richland Farms Location
Devon's rig, the Nabors #7, has moved to the Richland Farms location in East Feliciana Parish and spud on Tuesday.
Friday, January 6, 2012
Oil & Gas Investor - Emerging Plays
Indigo Minerals has provided a link to Oil & Gas Investor's January article on emerging plays:
http://www.indigominerals.com/docs/Emerging_Plays.pdf
http://www.indigominerals.com/docs/Emerging_Plays.pdf
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Scout Report - January 5, 2012
This week's Scout Report:
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
https://sites.google.com/site/tuscaloosatrend/scout-reports
Atinum P&A's the Indigo 16-1
After many challenges, Atinum p&a's the Indigo 16-1 Austin Chalk well.
SONRIS:
SONRIS:
17265'; CONTROL LOST CIRC; LOGGED WELL; 7 5/8" CSG COLLAPSED; TOF @ 15020'; SET CMT PLUGS; P&A WELL; |
Wednesday, January 4, 2012
Tuscaloosa Trend - Google Maps
The TMS and Austin Chalk locations can now be found on Google Maps:
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=204256365055521729132.0004b5bbdae554174421a&msa=0&ie=UTF8&t=m&vpsrc=6&ll=31.083518,-92.013245&spn=1.256067,3.34259&z=9
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?msid=204256365055521729132.0004b5bbdae554174421a&msa=0&ie=UTF8&t=m&vpsrc=6&ll=31.083518,-92.013245&spn=1.256067,3.34259&z=9
Encana Seeks Three More TMS Units in Mississippi
MISSISSIPPI
• Jan-2012: Docket
• Amite County (ENCANA): requesting the Board to integrate, with alternate risk charges, all interests in an exceptional sized 972.81-acre oil unit, situated in Sections 25, 36 and 37, Township 1 North, Range 5 East, to horizontally drill the Lawson 25H-1 Well, from an exception surface location due to topographical reasons 150’ FNL and 1,300’ FEL of Section 25, to a depth of 11,800’ to test the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Formation and all other formations and pools that may be encountered at an exception bottomhole location 330’ FSL and 660’ FEL of Section 36, with the right to horizontally drill up to three additional increased density wells with an unrestricted eighteen month test period for each well to establish a maximum efficiency rate (MER). Alternatively, Petitioner requests the Board to integrate all interests in said unit without alternate risk charges
• West Enterprise Field (ENCANA): requesting the Board to reform the presently-existing 640-acre oil unit for the Joe Jackson 4-13H Well, to a new exceptional sized 1,327.56-acre oil unit, situated in Sections 4 and 9, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, for production from the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Formation and to integrate, with alternate risk charges, all interests in said new unit. Petitioner is also requesting authority to horizontally drill the Joe Jackson 4H-2 Well as an increased density well, from an exception surface location due to topographical reasons 846’ FNL and 1,522’ FEL of Section 4, to a depth of 11,600’ to test the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Formation and all other formations and pools that may be encountered at an exception bottomhole location 330’ FSL and 660’ FEL of Section 9, with the right to horizontally drill up to two additional increased density wells on the unit, with an unrestricted eighteen month test period for each well to establish a maximum efficiency rate (MER) . Alternatively, Petitioner requests the Board to integrate all interests in said new unit without alternate risk charges.
• Amite County (ENCANA): requesting the Board to integrate, with alternate risk charges, all interests in an exceptional sized 1,951-acre oil unit, situated in Sections 28, 31 and 40, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, to horizontally drill the Ash 31H-1 Well, from an exception surface location due to topographical reasons 7,839.59’ FNL and 1,886’ FEL of Section 31, to a depth of 12,500’ to test the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Formation at an exception bottomhole location 660’ FNL and 1,893’ FWL of Section 28. Petitioner also requests authority to drill the Ash 31H-2 Well as an increased density well from an exception surface location 8,018’ FSL and 1,887’ FWL of Section 31, to a depth of 12,500’ to test the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale Formation at an exception bottomhole location 660’ FNL and 1,953’ FWL of Section 40, with the right to horizontally drill up to six additional wells on the unit, with an unrestricted eighteen month test period for each well to establish a maximum efficiency rate (MER). Alternatively, Petitioner requests the Board to integrate all interest in said unit without alternate risk charges.
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
Devon Signs Shale Partner
Devon has signed a joint venture deal to pursue their shale projects. The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale is one of the five.
"China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.’s Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration & Production unit agreed to buy a one-third stake in five Devon Energy Corp. (DVN) exploratory oil projects covering 1.2 million acres in the U.S. for $900 million. Sinopec will pay $900 million in cash and as much as $1.6 billion in Devon’s future drilling costs in exchange for the stakes in Ohio’s Utica Shale and petroleum deposits in Louisiana, Oklahoma, Michigan, Colorado and Wyoming, Devon said today in a statement. Devon began receiving offers in November for the package that includes the Utica Shale in Ohio, the Tuscaloosa Shale in Louisiana, the Niobrara Shale in Wyoming and Colorado, and tight-oil deposits in Michigan and Oklahoma, Richels said then."
Source: Bloomberg
Entire Article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-03/sinopec-agrees-to-pay-900-million-for-stakes-in-five-devon-shale-projects.html
Devon Press Release:
http://www.dvn.com/Newsroom/Pages/NewsRelease.aspx?id=1644020#terms?disclaimer=yes
"China Petroleum & Chemical Corp.’s Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration & Production unit agreed to buy a one-third stake in five Devon Energy Corp. (DVN) exploratory oil projects covering 1.2 million acres in the U.S. for $900 million. Sinopec will pay $900 million in cash and as much as $1.6 billion in Devon’s future drilling costs in exchange for the stakes in Ohio’s Utica Shale and petroleum deposits in Louisiana, Oklahoma, Michigan, Colorado and Wyoming, Devon said today in a statement. Devon began receiving offers in November for the package that includes the Utica Shale in Ohio, the Tuscaloosa Shale in Louisiana, the Niobrara Shale in Wyoming and Colorado, and tight-oil deposits in Michigan and Oklahoma, Richels said then."
Source: Bloomberg
Entire Article:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-03/sinopec-agrees-to-pay-900-million-for-stakes-in-five-devon-shale-projects.html
Devon Press Release:
http://www.dvn.com/Newsroom/Pages/NewsRelease.aspx?id=1644020#terms?disclaimer=yes
Sunday, January 1, 2012
Happy New Year
Happy New Year to all in the Tuscaloosa Trend. May 2012 bring you your "Jett Rink discovery" (minus the fist fight).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)